November marked the beginning of the four-year long reconstruction of Doyle Drive. At a price tag of over $1 billion, residents of the Presidio, Richmond and Marina districts are worried about the traffic situation the project may cause.
Built in 1936, Doyle Drive, or Route 101, has become seismically unsafe with 80 percent of the structure needing to be rebuilt, according to the San Francisco County’s final environmental impact statement/report for the Doyle Drive project. As the main thoroughfare for commuters coming to and from Marin County to San Francisco off the Golden Gate Bridge, the project has raised concerns about redirection of traffic flow by some residents and businesses.
“The project concerns all the business owners in the Presidio as well as people in San Francisco,” Megan Driscoll, owner of Presidio Fitness, said.
Driscoll opened her business in the Presidio three years ago and noticed traffic was a large concern for the area.
Prior to the start of construction on Doyle Drive the Presidio Trust, an operational body created by Congress in 1996 to manage and maintain the Presidio, commissioned a traffic study to determine the traffic flow into the park and the possible effects of the Doyle Drive Project.
The Fall 2009 Presidio Traffic Calming Study, which took place from Sept. 29 to Oct. 27, determined that daily traffic in the Presidio dropped by about 25 percent because of the closure of several roads throughout the park.
The study lasted three weeks, one week shorter than initially slated, according to the Presidio Trust, citing that the body had collected enough data by that point, but the temporary closures were met with resistance from nearby residents.
“The closures forced more traffic through our neighborhood,” Suzie Spiwak, a resident next to the Presidio for 12 years, said.
An average of 72,124 vehicles per weekday traveled through one of the Presidio’s gates before the study began, according to the Presidio traffic study. During the study period, the average dropped to 54,561 vehicles.
Before the study, approximately 50 percent of daily traffic through the gates was cut-through traffic, meaning the vehicles entered one of the gates and left through another within 15 minutes, according to the study, and during the three-week period only 24 percent of the traffic was cut-through.
Prior to the study, an average of 36,062 vehicles that entered the Presidio were cut-through, and during the study only an average of 14,186 vehicles were cut-through, meaning 21,876 vehicles that normally cut-through the Presidio were finding alternate routes.
Presently, traffic conditions in the Presidio have been returned to the same state they were in before the survey. But with the reconstruction of Doyle Drive started, residents of the area are concerned that the traffic will once again be redirected out of the park.
“The Richmond District is a family-based community,” Richmond District
resident Sarah Bacon said.
There are lots of kids, schools and parks scattered throughout the Richmond District, she said, and redirecting traffic through the area is a definite concern for families.
Despite the concerns of residents in surrounding areas, the Doyle Drive project is necessary, head of media and government relations for the Presidio Trust Clay Harrell said.
“The Doyle Drive project is really going to change things,” he said.
Initial plans for the construction of the project were started in 1991, Harrell said. In 2006, the Presidio Parkway plan was officially selected as the preferred approach to the reconstruction project. With the planning and development phases finished, the actual construction started in November and will not be done until 2013, assuming no fiscal problems arise.
Federal, state and local agencies have pulled together to cover the $1.045 billion price. The federal government is expected to pay a total of $202 million, though only $72 million is currently committed, according to Doyle Drive project Fact Sheet. The state has committed $420 million in funding to the project, leaving the remainder of $333 million being covered by various local agencies.
“It’s a massive project that needs to be done,” 22-year resident of the Marina George Merijohn said. “It may be inconvenient for the neighborhood for a while, but in the end it will be a great benefit for San Francisco as a whole.”